The "Run to 50" is complete. Blogging continues from this point on at Run to 51

Blog Archive

Wednesday, February 3, 2010

Sweeping Calories Under the Rug

I reached my goal weight (window range) back at the end of April/beginning of May 2009.  I've weighed 145 +/- 3 lbs ever since.  That's 9 full months of consistent weight maintenance.

But this is not a back-patting blog.  I'm trying to figure something out. 

I've maintained a consistent exercise program throughout the past year, and I believe that is what is mainly responsible for my weight maintenance.  Where I've fluctuated is in my caloric intake.  While "dieting," I try to restrict calories to 1600-1800 calories, which I figure is my Basal Metabolic Rate (BMR) calorie requirement plus energy requirements for a day's worth of light, routine activity.  My calorie deficit thus is created through daily exercise, and when I've done that I've dropped down to the low end of my range: 142-143 lbs.  When I'm not dieting (or, in other words, when I'm only trying to maintain a regular healthy diet), I try to shoot for 2000-2300.  When I do that, I seem to feed a 145-147 pound body because that's about where my weight stabilizes.

Sometimes, though, I've caught my weight drifting up to the 148-149 range, even though I think I'm still maintaining my target calorie intake and exercising regularly (and intensely).  All else being equal, this shouldn't make any sense.  Where are those extra lbs. coming from? 

I think the answer is that I'm not being truthful, sometimes, in my daily food accounting.  And I think the period when I'm the biggest offender of this is between dinner and bedtime.  It's as if I think a nibble here and a snack there, if swept under the rug, doesn't count and my body won't metabolize it.

Given my average daily exercise level, I should be able to eat 2300-2400 calories a day without gaining weight and maintaining a steady 145-146 lbs.  All it takes to gain a pound in a couple of weeks is to go over my target daily needs by 250 calories each day.  I can easily see that happening if I'm fast and loose with my calorie log and casting a blind eye on an "innocent" nosh during a stretch...even with my exercise regimen.

I have to keep this in mind and make a lifelong effort to not get lax.  I can't just depend on exercise and assume that the number of 800+ calorie-burning workout sessions gives me license to be careless with my diet.  Even after all this time, I still haven't habituated myself to a lifelong daily calorie plan of 2000 calories.  When I don't watch myself, I drift upwards.  It's insidious.

I've done a pretty good job of restoring myself to an active lifestyle.  What I need to do next is to train myself to abandon poor eating idiosyncrasies, like late night snacking or to let myself view a nibble or two of some sweet or fat-laden "empty" calories as having little or no impact on my daily calorie count.   



Anyway; to record today's training program results...

I ran a treadmill-based intervals program of "Yasso 800s," choosing a 7-minute pace for the speed segments. That's a little quicker than what Bart Yasso suggests, since I anticipate a marathon time of 3:50:00 to 4:00:00. According to that objective, each 800m (or 880yd) run should be done in 3 minutes 50 seconds to 4 minutes, which is more like an 8-minute mile pace. But I chose to pretend like I had a shot at a 3:30:00 marathon time and so ran my halves in 3:30.

I took a full 440 lap for recoveries, doing a combination of walks and slow jogs to get my heartrate back down to 50-65%. For each speed segment, I recorded my peak HR:
1155
2158
3161
4162
5164
6165
7165
8165

My perceived exertion level in those last three was definitely near a "10." I estimate 165 to be around 95% of HRmax for me and I really don't think I could maintain that level for more than a mile, if that. The half mile length was, itself something I was glad to see come to an end. If I have any hope of approaching a 20-minute 5K, I'm going to have to be more comfortable at a 7:00 pace sustained over 3 miles. I'm not even able to do that now in intervals with recoveries built in.

Good workout, but quite an eye opener.